Guide

Five things that ruin a meeting recording

None of them are the microphone. All of them are fixable in the ten seconds before a meeting starts.

4 min read · Updated 10 September 2026

1. The device is nearest the loudest person

Every room has someone everyone strains to hear, and they are the person the transcript will lose. Put the microphone nearer them, not in the geometric middle of the table.

If you are wearing the device, this means sitting nearer the quiet speaker rather than opposite them.

2. Air conditioning, and everything like it

Continuous background noise — an air conditioning unit, a fan, traffic through an open window — does not sound loud to a person because we filter it out unconsciously. A microphone cannot, and every word competes with it.

A meeting room with the AC on full is the single most common reason a recording in this region comes back poor. Turning it down for the twenty minutes that matter is worth more than any hardware.

3. Two people talking at once

Speaker separation works by finding the boundaries between voices. Overlapping speech has no boundary, so both speakers get merged or one gets dropped.

This is unavoidable in a real conversation, and it is why the useful output is a summary rather than a verbatim record. But the moments that matter — a decision, a number, a commitment — are worth saying into a gap rather than over someone.

4. The phone on the table doing something else

A phone that is recording and also receiving notifications is a phone whose microphone is being interrupted. On some devices a notification sound is recorded at full volume directly over whatever was being said.

This is a real advantage of a separate device, and we would say so even if we did not sell one.

5. Nobody said what the meeting was

A recording with no opening context produces a summary with no framing. Ten seconds of “this is the handover call for the Marina project, with Ahmed and Sara” gives the summary a subject, the speaker labelling two names, and you something searchable in six months.

It is the cheapest improvement on this list and the one people most reliably skip.

Keep reading

How to record a conversation without making it strange

The awkwardness of recording is not a technical problem, and no device solves it for you. This is what actually works.

5 min read →

Running a meeting that switches between Arabic and English

Code-switching is not a problem to be fixed. It is how business here is conducted — and most note-taking tools were not built for it.

6 min read →

What to actually do with a meeting transcript

A transcript is not notes. Nobody reads an hour of raw text, and treating it as an archive is how it becomes worthless.

4 min read →

How to choose an AI note taker without regretting it

Six questions that separate the tools that survive a month of real use from the ones that end up in a drawer.

6 min read →

Why transcription gets names wrong, and what to do about it

Every speech model is worse at names than at ordinary words, and the reason explains how to work around it.

5 min read →

Writing clinical notes without typing during the consultation

Typing changes what patients tell you. Here is how clinicians work around that, with and without a recording device.

6 min read →

Handing over a client without losing the context

The CRM has the facts. What gets lost is everything that explains them — and that is what the next person needs.

5 min read →

How long should you keep a recording?

Most people keep everything forever by default. That is a decision, even when nobody made it deliberately.

5 min read →

Running a one-to-one people do not dread

The format is not the problem. The problem is that nothing said in the last one visibly happened.

5 min read →
Chat with a human · replies in ~1h